Technical Articles and Product Descriptions

Reference Materials

Additional Products

Race Engine Technology Magazine

As an introductory comment, let me state that EPI, Inc. is a big fan of Hy-Vo™ chain drives WHEN THEY ARE PROPERLY APPLIED. And there are numerous applications in which the Hy-Vo chain is an appropriate solution.

One common Hy-Vo™ application is in the 4WD transfer cases in automotive transmissions. They work very well there because of (a) the relatively low pitchline velocities and ( b) the relatively small percentage of total time that any serious load is applied to the chain.

And one of the very attractive features of a HyVo™ chain drive is that it eliminates the chordal oscillation that is inherent with roller chain drives, at (RPM/60 x driver tooth count) Hz.

We have used Hy-Vo™ chain drives in several successful industrial transmission situations as well as several helicopter gearboxes. They work well in those applications because (a) the loading is appropriate for the capacity of the chain used, and (b) the distance between input and output shafts is large enough that a geared solution would be prohibitively heavy or expensive (or both).

Based on current research and design projects, EPI, Inc. has determined that a PSRU with suitable reliability for aircraft applications could be implemented with Hy-Vo™ link chain. It would be substantially heavier than one of EPI's geared units for the same torque capacity, but it might be less expensive.

There are several design issues with respect to Hy-Vo™ chain drives to be considered.

The first is determining if the capacity of the chain is sufficient to preclude failure in the projected load model for an appropriate amount of time with an appropriate factor of safety.

One common design error encountered in Hy-Vo-based PSRU products occurs as a result of the designer using the measured (or desired) engine power to select a chain pitch and width that will, according to the catalog numbers, support that power level, WITHOUT multiplying that engine power level by the load adjustment factors that are based on the driving power source and the driven load. In the worst cases, that multiplier is given as 1.8, and in the case of a propeller driven by a directly-connected piston engine, the multiplier stated in the design literature is 1.5.

That over-rating inevitably leads to very short in-service life and the threat of the explosive failure described below.

HY-VO FAILURE MODES

There are two primary failure modes with a link-chain drive.

The first is a progressive failure which results from an apparent elongation of the chain due to wear in the link-pin joint. Failure occurs when the apparent chain elongation has reached the point that the chain begins to skip teeth. Catastrophic failure is not far behind that event.

The second, and more critical failure mode, is a catastrophic breakage of the chain due to tensile fatigue loading of the sideplates. This failure is sudden, complete, and potentially explosive.

HY-VO CHAIN LOADS

Let's examine the two sources of chain load.

The first is APPLIED TORQUE. Torque from the engine is applied to the driving sprocket. That torque produces a tension force in the tight side of the chain which is equal to the applied torque (lb-in) divided by the pitch radius of the sprocket (same as the TANGENTIAL FORCE on a gear). The chain transmits that tension force onto the driven sprocket, and that tension force applies a torque to the output shaft, the value of which is the input torque multiplied by the ratio of the pitch diameters - - OR the tooth-count ratio (Driven Sprocket TC ÷ DRIVER SPROCKET TC).

The second source of chain tensile loading is CENTRIFUGAL FORCE. That force results from the chain traveling in a circular direction around the two sprockets, and produces a tension force which is equal throughout the entire length of chain. That force is proportional to the weight of the chain and to the square of the pitchline velocity.

The centrifugal force adds to the driving tension force on the tight side of the chain. On the slack side, the chain is still carrying the tensile force generated by the chain centrifugal action. Therefore, with a constant torque applied to the drive, the cyclic loading on a given link varies once per full travel cycle around both sprockets, from the high tensile load (driving-plus-centrifugal on the tight side) to the low tensile load (centrifugal-only on the loose side) and back to the high tensile load. If the magnitude of that varying load is too high, the side links of the chain will fracture from fatigue cycling (explained fully HERE).

In the Morse Hy-Vo chain tables, you will notice that the power rating of a given chain will increase as RPM increases, at a fairly linear rate UP TO A CERTAIN RPM, and then the rate tapers off substantially until the power increase with RPM becomes very small. That is because of the ever-increasing tensile load that results from the centrifugal force of the whirling chain, which adds to the tension load being applied by the driving sprocket.

Chains of a specific pitch are rated by horsepower capacity per inch of width for DIFFERENT DIAMETER DRIVING SPROCKETS and for DIFFERENT RPM. That rating method is a simplified way to take into account the fact that there are two different sources of tensile loading in the chain: (a) applied torque and (b) centrifugal force from rotational speed. The rated horsepower number in the Morse HyVo chain tables combines those parameters. The power capacities listed in the HyVo design tables are the maximum for which Morse Engineering have determined the chain can provide "infinite life" when their application-specific limitations are observed..

The engineering people who designed the Hy-Vo chain, based on millions of hours of real-life experience with all kinds of driving machinery (gasoline engines, diesel engines, electric motors, turbine motors, etc. etc.) and all kinds of driven machinery (reciprocating pumps, centrifugal compressors, propellers, generators, machine tools, etc), have determined the values of fatigue loading which a specific chain, in a specific application (Power loading, RPM, Driving torque fluctuations, Driven load characteristics, Start / stop characteristics, and more) can survive for 2.5 million cycles. If the chain can survive that number of cycles at that specific fatigue loading, the chain is considered to have " infinite life ".

The following analyses use data from a relatively recent (1998) Morse Chain design catalog. The load values in that edition reflect a substantially stronger chain than what was described in earlier (1971) catalogs.

I have, in the past, communicated with Morse engineers, who were kind enough to give me test results, chain elasticity values (from which one can calculate the torsional rate provided by a specific chain configuration), hardness specs, UTS numbers, and other non-catalog data.

The calculations that follow are the results of the use of Morse engineering data and testing.

HY-VO CHAIN EXAMPLE

As an example, consider a reduction drive configuration using a 1/2" pitch HyVo chain, with a 23-tooth driving sprocket and a 59-tooth driven sprocket (2.56 ratio) and a distance of 8.245" between shafts. Those dimensions require a chain with 76 pitches, which is a chain length of 38 inches (76 x 1/2).

If the PSRU is being driven at 4000 engine RPM, that produces a chain pitchline velocity of 3874 ft/minute. That pitchline velocity, with a chain length of 38 inches, produces approximately 1223 tensile cycles per minute or about 73380 cycles per hour. At that rate, it takes only 34 hours to apply 2.5 million fatigue cycles to the chain { 2,500,000 / 73,380 = 34.07 }.

If, however, the engine torque pulses (see TORSIONAL EXCITATION BY PISTON ENGINES) are superimposed onto the chain tensile fatigue loading, not only do the tensile loads increase by a large multiple, but the cyclic frequency increases rapidly as well.

For example, at 4000 RPM, an 8-cylinder 4-cycle engine produces 16,000 torque pulses per minute (4 x 4000 = 16,000, or 267 Hz), which is over 13 times greater ( 16,000 ÷1223 = 13.08) than the fatigue-cycling rate which occurs from just rotation with no torsional pulses applied.

Adding to the example introduced above, suppose that PSRU (with a 2.00" wide, 1/2-inch pitch Hy-Vo chain and a 23-tooth driving sprocket), is being driven by an 8-cylinder, spark-ignition, 4-cycle V8 piston engine. The engine makes a takeoff-power value of 450 HP at 4400 RPM (537 lb-ft of torque) and makes 400 cruise HP at a 4000 RPM. (525 lb-ft of torque).

Also suppose that the coupling between this PSRU and the engine crankshaft provides sufficient torsional absorption so that virtually no torsional excitation is applied to the PSRU's driving sprocket.

In that scenario (a completely smooth engine input signature), at the takeoff power rating of 450 HP and 4400 RPM, the design life of a 2.00-wide chain (using equations and values provided by Morse Chain engineering data) is just under 2 hours.

HOWEVER, the Morse Engineering design instructions specify a variety of power multiplier factors based on the type of dirving machinery and the type of driven machinery. (Those factors range as high as 1.8 for different applications.) For a piston engine driving a propeller, their recommended power multiplier is 1.5. Using the 450 HP value above, multiplied by their 1.5 design factor, produces a new power figure of 675 HP. At 675 HP and 4500 RPM, the predicted life of the 2.00" chain is about 6 MINUTES.

At the cruise rating of 400 HP at 4000 RPM, the design life of the 2.00" wide, 1/2" pitch chain (with NO MULTIPLIER) is about 3.6 hours.

HOWEVER, if that same chain is subjected to the raw torsional pulsing of the engine (ie, connected to the PSRU by something OTHER than an effective torsional absorber system), the expected life will be much lower. Depending on the amplitude and frequency of the applied torsional cyclic loading, the safe applied power level for that 2.00-inch wide, 1/2-inch pitch Hy-Vo chain would be MUCH lower than 400 HP.

Those life values are based on the fatigue strength of the outer links. As explained on THIS PAGE, the endurance limit of a material is a statistical value, based on apparently-identical polished specimens, tested at various fully-reversing bending stress levels in a laboratory. But the real-life application of an EL has to be based on adjustments to a value known as the Application-Specific-Endurance-Limit, explained HERE.

There are various specific factors in the HyVo side-link that contribute to a substantial EL downrating, which include (a) the stress concentration factor resulting from the sharp corners in the "D"-shaped pivot pin hole, (b) the additional applied stress (beyond simply tensile) resulting from the bending moment applied at the link "crotch" line, and (c) residual stresses in the material resulting from the mass-production stamping process.

The wear-induced loosening of the chain is another issue entirely.

All that being said, there is anecdotal data in the field that support the claim that a 2.00" wide, 1/2" pitch, HyVo PSRU can survive for hundreds of hours, being driven by a high-powered V8 engine.

But since I design products for others to use, it would be the paragon of stupidity for me to ignore the engineering numbers provided by the manufacturer, and instead, base my design on some off-the-wall claim (like 1000 hp through "Mah Harley's 1.25" width HyVo chain")

You, as an experimental builder, can build and fly pretty-much anything that the Wishful Thinking School of Engineering can generate..........Not quite the same for me.

PLAINTIFF LAWYER: SO, Mr Designer, you ignored the manufacturer's engineering data and designed a gearbox that failed in flight and killed the plaintiff's husband, leaving the PLAINTIFF a widow, responsible for the livelihood of seven young children...............etc, etc.

DEFENDANT: Yup, 'cause ah know more than they do......

Picture how THAT turns out.......

BEARING LOADS

It has been claimed that a chain drive is better than a gear drive because it eliminates the shaft bearing loads from the separation force which gears generate. Although the elimination of gear-separation loading is technically true, the reality is that in a chain drive, the gear separation force pushing the shafts apart is replaced by a similar force which is pulling the two shafts together, approximately equal to the sum of the driving tension plus twice the centrifugal force. That force increases with chain speed, and can become very large. It is applied to the bearings on both shafts.

COOLING

Component temperature is an important consideration in chain drives. The manufacturer specifies a maximum of 250°F for the chain in order to stay safely away from the tempering temperature. If that temperature is reached, the tensile strength and fatigue life of the chain will be significantly reduced, as will the life expectancy of any rolling element bearings. (see LUBRICATION AND COOLING).

VIBRATION PROPERTIES

An interesting property of a Hy-Vo chain is the elastic elongation (stretch) which the chain experiences in response to a load. This stretch-per-unit-load (aka "spring rate") inserts an apparent torsional rate into the system, and somewhat reduces the first mode resonant frequency of the system.

Typical torsional rates for a 2:1 reduction ratio implemented with 2.0, 3.0, or 4.0-inch wide chain are roughly 266, 328 and 375 lb-ft per degree respectively. (That rate VARIES with the tooth count of both sprockets, the chain width and the distance from the input shaft to the propshaft.)

HOWEVER, this chain rate does NOT alter the pulse transmission characteristics of the ENGINE-TO-DRIVEGEAR coupling. If the transmissibility of the ENGINE-TO-DRIVEGEAR coupling is not low enough, the engine pulses are still applied to the driving sprocket and then to the chain, and might very well be be amplified (see TRANSMISSIBILITY) depending on the system characteristics.

The torsional chain rate MIGHT or MIGHT NOT diminish the pulse amplitude applied to the output shaft and the propeller, depending on the masses and spring rates of the other components of the system.

"SELF DAMPING" ???

We have heard several purveyors describe their link-chain drive as being "self-damping". Let’s discuss these alleged "self-damping" characteristics.

First, recall the discussion of VIBRATION BASICS, where damping was defined as the property of energy dissipation. The dissipation of feedback energy from a system near resonance has the effect of limiting the vibration amplitude from going totally out of control. Recall that, no matter how much damping there is in a system, at resonance, there will still be amplification of the excitation forces.

Various marketeers of Hy-Vo PSRU drives claim that, because the slack side of the chain is loaded only by the centrifugal-tension force, somehow that magically introduces "damping" into the system. All it really introduces is backlash, which increases as the chain stretches through wear.

There can be an argument made that resonant vibration is less likely to go out of control because, near resonance, the entities being driven by the chain (prop and propshaft) have a difficult time feeding energy back into the vibrating system, due to the large amount of effective backlash. That effect is probably what is being incorrectly hyped as "self-damping".

In the BEST case, the effective backlash can PARTIALLY attenuate the feedback of vibration energy from the prop when the system is operating with an excitation frequency close to a resonance point. But remember, damping is only a crutch for a poorly-designed system operating near resonance (explained HERE).

However, the claim that, because of the backlash, a HyVo chain drive is somehow immune from torsional excitation problems is at best a demonstration of a profound lack of understanding of the problem, and at worst, a callous prioritization of sales over the safety of others.

The "self-damping" claim completely ignores the bigger problems, which result from the piston engine pulsing forces (a) causing destructive vibratory loads in the gears (or sprockets and chain) of a transmission unit, and (b) causing destructive blade vibration in the propeller. After all, the prop does not vibrate unless it is induced to do so by the application of an intermittent force at or near one of the resonant frequencies of the components (mainly BLADES) (see PROPELLER VIBRATION).

When the connection between the engine and gearbox does not attenuate those pulsing forces to near-zero, the pulsing of a piston engine will not only be applied to the PSRU innards, but will also be applied to the prop blades, whether or not there is feedback to the engine.

By way of comparison, the properties of the EPI PSRU Coupling Systems reduce the engine-pulsing forces seen by the drive gear of the transmission to NEARLY-ZERO. That is what enables us to use 1.5-INCH WIDE GEARS to carry 450 V8 horsepower for a very long time.

To analyze it further, consider the torque waveform of a V8 engine (TORSIONAL EXCITATION BY PISTON ENGINES) applied to the driving gear in a chain reduction.

Suppose a chain-PSRU is attached to the crankshaft of a V8 with a torsionally rigid coupling. As an example, let’s use the 450 HP engine described in the examples above, which produces a mean peak torque of 537 lb.-ft. Suppose that engine is driving a HyVo chain PSRU inwith the driving gear in the chain PSRU has a 4" pitch diameter. Then at the mean torque (600 lb.-ft.), the tight side of the chain is carrying about 3600 pounds of driving tension force (PLUS the centrifugal component).

But remember that the torque occurs in pulses. At the instantaneous torque peak (200%), the chain carries 7200 pounds of driving tension. At the instantaneous torque valley (10%), the chain carries about 360 pounds of driving tension. So the driving tension in the tight side of the chain is varying between 360 and 7200 pounds, but never goes to zero. That cyclic loading is far beyond the life capacity of a 4" wide, 1/2-inch pitch Hy-Vo chain.

In addition, at 4000 RPM, the centrifugal tensile load in the chain is about 800 pounds. In a non-resonant condition, the centrifugal force is not enough to cause the tight side of the chain to bulge or to create any slack during the torque valleys. Clearly then, the torsional excitation which the engine produces is being transmitted very effectively onto the chain.

The elasticity of the chain (described above) will affect the pulse amplitude transmitted onto the output shaft. That amplitude could be increased or decreased, depending on the other properties of the system.

The only time decoupling (due to chain slop) can occur is if the torque waveform goes negative or if the driven entity is being excited near its resonant frequency. Because that pounding is being shared by so many teeth, the sprocket teeth are more tolerant of the abuse, but the chain takes a mighty beating. It’s no wonder the chains stretch and fail.